I am on a short wine tasting break, and came back to my hotel to find the staff had placed a big bunch of these fantastic smelling flowers. Pretty sure they are wattle (acacia), but what do you all think?
“‘Fresh’ is a bad term in general because it has so many meanings to so many people, and after a while it doesn’t mean as much. But when I say “fresh,” I mean that it’s bracing and invigorating, rather than ‘sporty’ or ‘spicy.’”
I do think the word gets a bit of a bad wrap in fragrance circles, because things that are billed with the term usually smell about as fresh as (and remarkably similar to) an Axe-drenched teenage boy at the gym. But like Josh Meyer, when I say a fragrance is fresh, I mean it is bracing and refreshing.
Supernova initially smells of lime zest and effervescence. Surprisingly, this zingy stage lasts for more than an hour on my skin. However, Supernova also has another trick up its sleeve, which is to shift from the very dry, almost gin-and-lime opening into something damp and earthy. I smell mossy notes, patchouli, and a tendril of campfire smoke. The official notes are petitgrain, bergamot, grapefruit, limeleaf, juniper berries, cognac, ginger, cardamon, cedar, oakmoss, and amber.
To date, I haven’t found any reviews of Roads’ Supernova, but I will update in the future to add links.
Image courtesy Little Flaming Cocktail. Sample sent to me gratis, at my request. Reviews are never compensated, and posts are never sponsored. See my Media & Disclosure policy for details.
*Side note: I really like the idea behind the new Imaginary Authors scent, Mosaic (discussed in the linked interview).
There should be a word (preferably a German word of many syllables) for the moment when you realize that a perfume is as good as its concept.
“This represents the woman who, as a result of the limited freedoms offered to her, had to use her femininity and elegance to achieve her goals. The headiness of tuberose, frangipani, old rose and heliotrope is lifted with mandarin, muget and clove and grounded in green moss, cedarwood, virginian sandalwood and patchouli.”
That is the description of Graduate 1954, by Roads, that enticed me to seek out this brand.
Right from the opening, Graduate 1954 (perfumer not released) presents an elegant face. A very convincing moss (let’s call it fauxkmoss) blends with frangipani and with a tuberose that smells like the buttercream frosting version of itself. These softer elements are sharpened not only by the moss, but by a slightly sour tea rose, a very green lily of the valley, some clove, and perhaps a hint of carnation and bergamot. They keep everything standing up straight, and keep it from becoming languid or overblown. This is, after all, a very chypre chypre floral. As for the drydown, it feels to me like an homage to the Guerlinade—less sweet, but with the same quality of being a mélange of the most essential parts of the fragrance. The drydown wears close to the skin like a Guerlain, too. The perfume equivalent of smudged eyeliner.
I always seem to fall for fragrances like this, the ones that feel classic but also new, not like vintage reproductions. Graduate 1954 definitely deserves a place on the shelf next to perfumes like Chanel No. 5 Eau Premiere, Krigler’s Lieber Gustav 14, and (recently) Courtesan by Worth.
I have not seen any other reviews of Roads’ Graduate 1954 yet, but will update in the future when I do.
Since some of you may wonder about distribution (as I did), Roads perfumes are available at Barney’s in the US, at Jovoy in Paris, several Selfridge’s in the UK, the Galleries Lafayette in Berlin, and Klein Perfumery in Melbourne. Other stockists are listed on their website. My samples were sent to me gratis, at my request, and I have to add a big thanks not only to Roads’ PR, but to their Australian distributor T2M Fashion. Reviews are never compensated, and posts are never sponsored. See my Media & Disclosure policy for details.
Birds singing, flowers blooming, butterflies and rainbows and kittens and … you get the idea. I’m in love.
It’s not often (especially lately) that I go completely bananas over a perfume, but ever since I first read about Guerlain’s limited edition Terracotta Le Parfum, I had a sneaky feeling it would be perfection. Who wouldn’t want a suntan, beachy scent by Guerlain? The past Terracotta perfumes (Vol d’Ete and Sous le Vent) have not met my ideal, but the early reviews of Terracotta Le Parfum (and comparisons to Bronze Goddess) convinced me this year’s edition could be the one.
Terracotta is heavy on rich jasmine that would probably be very indolic if it wasn’t tamped by the suntan oil quality (which is only very lightly coconutty). It also incorporates a lot of tiare, orange blossom, and vanilla. The sweetness in Terracotta comes from the vanilla (which I perceive as a group of vanilla accords, some sweeter and some spicier), that creates a Guerlinade-light effect. It is indeed perfection.
And now for the comparisons. To my nose, there isn’t as direct a comparison with Bronze Goddess as other reviewers have found. Yes, they have a lot in common, but Bronze Goddess is much more coconut-forward, its white florals are more buoyant, and its sweetness is pina colada sweetness. The Terracotta has more dimension. I would say Bronze Goddess is the day to Terracotta Le Parfum’s night.
I also didn’t find Terracotta very similar to Lys Soleia (although of course it does have a general feeling and some notes in common). Lys Soleia was almost all lily on me, and was more aggressively indolic than Terracotta.
Perfume was my own acquisition. Reviews are never compensated, and posts are never sponsored. See my Media & Disclosure policy for details.
If you live in the US, you might be able to track down one of the last remaining bottles by contacting Dillards. The UPC code is 3346470417694. Go forth and buy. xo
I have been itching to try some perfumes by La Via del Profumo, an Italian company under perfumer Abdes Salaam, since reading about his creations on Suzanne’s Perfume Journal. I was lucky enough to win Milano Caffe in a draw on Australian Perfume Junkies, so today’s review truly comes from the bounty of the perfume blogosphere.
If you’re a regular reader, you know I have sought out coffee scents for years, without finding one that is truly my ideal. The reigning favorite is Coffee & Cedar, by what appears to be a defunct tiny Etsy operation.
As Suzanne noted, Milano Caffe can’t really be compared to any of the well-known coffee scents on the market. It’s richer and more “roasted” than Bond No. 9′s New Haarlem, and just plain richer than Jo Malone’s Black Vetyver Cafe. It’s not as one-noted as Dawn Spencer Hurwitz’s coffee frag, and it’s more coffee-centric than, say, Bell Antonio or L’Eau de Navigateur.
The opening of Milano Caffe is, to me, overloaded with several natural molecules that I am familiar with from other fragrances—but particularly several by Neil Morris. At this stage, it smells very much like a muddy and blurred-out patchouli, although patchouli isn’t a listed note. Milano Caffe isn’t as vaporous as Borneo 1834 (lacking the menthol that gives Borneo its amazing heavy lightness), but I agree completely with Suzanne that it hearkens a bit to Borneo. I also agree with Portia that wearers would be advised not to bury their noses in Milano Caffe for at least an hour after spraying.
After several hours, Milano Caffe does soften considerably, and I enjoy a few moments of a mellow, slightly sweet blend of coffee and spices before the scent fades. But unfortunately, the messy and muddy opening (far too typical of natural perfumes, in my opinion), spoils Milano Caffe for me. I have tested it many times, striving to experience the elegant and wonderfully complex scent that Suzanne and Portia describe, but it just doesn’t sing on my skin.
Have you tried Milano Caffe? What is your favorite coffee-based scent?
For reviews of La Via del Profumo Milano Caffe, see the links above or check Fragrantica.
Sample was won in a draw. Posts are never compensated or sponsored. Image courtesy Fragrantica.
Random.org has spoken, and the winner is (I swear to goodness – I never manipulate draw results in favor of particular ‘fumie friends): Undina! Undina, please send me your preferred shipping address, and thanks to everyone else for entering the draw.
Love Chloe Eau Intense is a perfume of two faces. One face is a spiky-edgy, purple-toned floriental. The other is simply a plumptious floral.
Asali recommended the perfume to me, I think in the context of a discussion about Lolita Lempicka, and the heliotrope-heavy floriental opening of Eau Intense does remind me a lot of a more sophisticated and less sweet version of Lolita Lempicka. It’s helped to be more sophisticated by some very nice powdery musks that are almost suede-like, and a more modern (less gourmand) vanilla. But as Eau Intense develops, those rougher edges get buffed out by the powder, and the florals round out really nicely. I can’t pick out individual floral notes, but will say that it smells much softer at this stage than you’d expect from the note list. All in all, Eau Intense is much more special than I expected from a flanker that didn’t get much attention.
Oh, and I do love the bottle.
Sample was my own acquisition. Reviews are never compensated, and posts are never sponsored. See my Media & Disclosure policy for details.